Classifying Assessing Health Impacts from Urban Air Pollution Differences


Time series: random data plus trend, with best...

Image via Wikipedia

Implications of different approaches for characterizing ambient air pollutant concentrations within the urban airshed for time-series studies and health benefits analyses (26 page pdf, Matthew J Strickland, Lyndsey A Darrow, James A Mulholland, Mitchel Klein, W DANA Flanders, Andrea Winquist and Paige E Tolbert, Environmental Health 2011, 10:36, May 11, 2011)
Today’s review article examined the consequences in terms of health impacts in using a single centrally located urban air quality measurement compared to several measurements and how these measurements were weighted. Cautions are noted that centrally located monitors may indicate higher levels of pollutants than the average of several. When assessing health impacts of vulnerable subpopulations, such as the elderly and children, a weighting system that takes this into account would likely more useful than an unweighted average.

To see Key Quotes and Links to key reports about this post, click HERE

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: